A critique on love and human nature

[ad_1]

In Voltaire’s “Candide,” the main character Candide travels through the world in the pursuit of reuniting with his one true love, the beautiful Cunégonde. Throughout his journey, Candide visits Lisbon, Buenos Aires, Venice and Paris, experiencing the adventures and dangers of a lifetime. As his last destination, Candide arrives in Istanbul, where he reunites with his Cunégonde, but the beautiful Cunégonde of his youthful memories has disappeared; she has become an ugly, old woman. Through death, deception, and numerous hardships, Candide’s hope for reuniting with his beautiful Cunégonde had kept him alive and perseverant. Yet the root of his undying hope was a lie, as there was no beauty to rediscover, in the end; it was all in his head. 

As I thought about the absurdity of Candide’s lifelong desire to reunite with a first love whose beauty no longer exists, I questioned whether this is what love really is. Isn’t love a made-up story we tell ourselves? 

Strangely enough, soon after finishing the novel, I experienced a similar disappointment to that of Candide. In my mind, I had written him to be a deep character worthy of falling in love with, a story based on all the books I grew up reading. He was not the character I had thought him to be in the end. 

Maybe this glamorous concept that gets our hearts racing and our minds filled with dreams is only something we compose in our heads. We see someone and we add virtue to them. We associate too much meaning with them. We imagine them to be grander than who they really are. I think this is what love is: it is in our minds, and it is simply not real. We tend to fall in love with the idea of people, not who they really are. 

Perhaps love is a delusion. Or it is that people change. We are fluidic, and as our life paths continue, we change into new people. Sometimes it is growth, and sometimes it is decay. 

I don’t know how to explain it.

The funny thing is, after going through so much hardship for the sake of reuniting with his Cunégonde, being beaten nearly to death, almost killed and manipulated by others numerous times through his journey, in the end Candide’s reunion with Cunégonde didn’t give him peace. Instead, he found her more intolerable and cranky day by day. There were no such hardships anymore in Candide’s life, but normal life in Istanbul didn’t give peace either. Candide and his friends continued to whine about what was missing in their lives, even though now they were in the better place they were hoping to end up in. Then what was the point of all this struggle? Will we be as delusional as Candide in the future we are hoping to lead?

Perhaps this is what a marriage is: love turning into misery between two people. Upon how their lives end up in Istanbul, Candide’s realistic but pessimistic companion Martin concludes that “man was born to live either in a state of distracting inquietude or of lethargic disgust”. Is Martin right? Is anything really never enough? 

I don’t know. Perhaps people get used to the good things in their lives without noticing.  

Candide ends on a didactic note — that we must plant our own garden to attain happiness. He and his friend Martin meet with a wise Turkish man in Istanbul who tells them not to think about other people’s lives, but rather to work instead, saying that “labor preserves us from three great evils — weariness, vice, and want”. The only way to be happy, according to the wise man, is to produce something. Thus, Martin and his friends find peace: they work in their garden and Cunegonde becomes a baker. 

I think this is the right way of finding peace and happiness. 

While reading “Candide,” I found myself in an internal dilemma as to whether human nature is good or bad. I believe Voltaire wants us to realize that either human nature is bad and that it is easy and convenient for people to act badly, or that there is both good and bad in people. Throughout the book, Candide appears to represent the good, and the people he encounters through his journey tend to benefit from the good he does and in turn, manipulate him. 

As Candide and his friend sail to Lisbon, a storm starts, bringing chaos to the boat. A character named Jacques saves one of the crew members from falling into the sea while he is clinging to a mast, but as a result of his efforts, Jacques falls into the sea, and the crew member whose life he just saved doesn’t help him back. This could be a symbol of how human relations are in real life: you could go to great lengths in helping a person who wouldn’t do the same for you. People can accept the good you do for them without feeling the need to do good for you in return. 

At the same time, “Candide” also demonstrates how doing bad things can lead to good outcomes for people. In one scene, Candide and his friend Cacambo get held hostage by a native tribe who want to kill them for being Jesuits. Previously in the book, Candide had killed Cunegonde’s brother, who was a Jesuit (or so he thinks — later in the book we actually learn that Cunegonde’s brother has survived). To save themselves, Cacambo explains to the tribe that they aren’t Jesuits, as Candide wouldn’t have killed one if he was a Jesuit. After verifying that this is true, the tribe sets Candide and Cacambo free. In this way Candide’s bad act turns out to be a good event for him, saving his life: if Candide hadn’t killed a man, he would have died. 

When Candide is in Paris, people notice that he is wearing a big diamond ring, and they come to his help. He notes that on his first trip to Paris, he was poor and sick, and no one had come to help. Perhaps this shows how much people care about status and wealth when forming friendships.  

From love to human motivation, Voltaire’s “Candide” reveals striking ideas (or perhaps facts) about human nature. Perhaps we are delusional when it comes to love, and perhaps we are not inherently good after all. 

[ad_2]

Polk County sheriff’s hobby of nature photography

[ad_1]

Sheriff Grady Judd, a nature photographer in his free time

UP NEXT

UP NEXT

If you’ve lived anywhere in Florida for any amount of time, you’ve likely already heard of Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd. He’s known for his witty one-liners as he smacks a printout of a mugshot on his podium, announcing another arrest. 

That’s when he’s in front of the camera. 

Behind the camera, it’s an entirely different scene. 

When he’s not in his dark green sheriff’s office uniform with a badge and gun strapped to him, he’s wearing a breezy PFG shirt, a sun hat and toting around his DSLR.

“You know, God creates the art,” Judd said. “You just have to be there to capture it.”

Judd picked up nature photography more than a decade ago. He enjoyed taking pictures as a kid, then got back into it after a less-than-subtle nudge from his doctor. 

“I went to the doctor and he said, ‘What’s your hobby?’ And I said ‘work,'” Judd said. “He said, ‘Well, you need a hobby.’ And I said, ‘No, I don’t. I’ve got a hobby.’ He said, ‘Well, you need a distraction.'”

It’s in nature’s quiet, far away from crime scenes and caution tape, Judd finds his calm. 

“We’re in the middle of conflict every day at work all day long and this is the antithesis of conflict,” he said.

Swapping conflict for harmony, as the sun rises, Judd spends the hours before his shift at Circle B Bar Reserve. Nature has become Judd’s church, where he goes to disconnect from his day-to-day and connect to the things that matter most to him.

“Nature is all interconnected,” Judd said. “And that’s why my soul is filled when I’m out here because this is where I feel closest to nature and closest to God. 

“It’s where your inner being understands that you’re part of this, whether you acknowledge it or believe it or not.”

If you find yourself inside the Polk County Sheriff’s Office, you will likely see some of Judd’s work hanging on the walls. 

Malique Rankin is a general assignment reporter with 10 Tampa Bay. You can email her story ideas at [email protected] and follow her Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram pages.



[ad_2]

Decoding the King’s nature-inspired coronation invitation

[ad_1]

The vibrant coronation invitation has been designed by Andrew Jamieson, a heraldic artist and manuscript illuminator and a Brother of the Art Workers’ Guild, of which King Charles is an Honorary Member. The palace explained that the ‘original artwork for the invitation was hand-painted in watercolour and gouache, and the design, which recalls the Coronation Emblem, will be reproduced and printed on recycled card, with gold foil detailing.’ Included in the design is ‘the motif of the Green Man, an ancient figure from British folklore, symbolic of spring and rebirth, to celebrate the new reign.’ Shown ‘crowned in natural foliage’, the form of Green Man is made up of ‘leaves of oak, ivy and hawthorn, and the emblematic flowers of the United Kingdom.’

The intricate design along the border of the invitation is inspired by a ‘British wildflower meadow’, featuring ‘lily of the valley, cornflowers, wild  strawberries, dog roses, bluebells, and a sprig of rosemary for remembrance, together with wildlife including a bee, a butterfly, a ladybird, a wren and a robin.’ The flowers are grouped in threes, ‘signifying The King becoming the third monarch of his name.’ A lion, unicorn and boar also appear among the flowers, a nod to ‘the coats of arms of Their Majesties’, while the Queen Consort’s arms ‘are now enclosed by the Garter, following her installation as a Royal Lady of the Order of the Garter last summer.’

LONDON, ENGLAND – JUNE 05: Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Charles, Prince of Wales and Prince George of Cambridge on the balcony of Buckingham Palace during the Platinum Jubilee Pageant on June 05, 2022 in London, England. The Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II is being celebrated from June 2 to June 5, 2022, in the UK and Commonwealth to mark the 70th anniversary of the accession of Queen Elizabeth II on 6 February 1952. (Photo by Chris Jackson/Getty Images)Chris Jackson/Getty Images

[ad_2]

Save $500 dollars on the Panasonic Lumix S5 with a lens attachment

[ad_1]

The Panasonic Lumix S5 is an affordable full-frame camera that appeals to photographers and videographers alike and it’s now $500 off. 

Although the video features outweigh the photography capabilities, this camera packs a lot of punch, especially at this reduced price. Its ergonomic design is small but suited for photographers and it has a rugged, robust and weatherproof body.

Currently, some of the direct competitors this camera has is the Nikon Z6 or the Sony Alpha III. However, this deal means you can snap up the Lumix S5, which offers similar features, for a fraction of the price. You can pick up the Lumix S5 and a LUMIX S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 lens for $1797.99.






© Provided by Space


Panasonic LUMIX S5 Full Frame Mirrorless Camera: was $2297.99, now $1797.99 at Amazon. 

Save $500 on an excellent mirrorless camera that offers a 24.2MP CMOS sensor, continuous shooting, a max ISO range of up to 51,200, 4K video and slow motion up to 180FPS. It’s designed with ease of use in mind, is compact and lightweight and is packed full of quality.View Deal

The Panasonic LUMIX S5 is a full-frame camera with a 24.2 MP CMOS sensor which has been placed in a compact body. The multi-faceted lens which comes with this deal is great for a range of photography styles. The wide-angle features are good for close indoor and landscape photographs. Alternatively, it’s suitable for street photography too.

However, this camera features continuous shooting at 7.0 fps, which is the rate of pictures you can take in a second, which is a little lackluster. This limits the type of photography you are likely to use this for and won’t be the best for high-speed sport or wildlife photography. 

We’ve covered some of the photography aspects but where this camera shines is its video capabilities. This camera has a max ISO range of up to 51,200 and comes with a dual native ISO, this means that image noise is heavily reduced at high ISOs. This means that the Lumix S5 has brilliant capabilities in low-light conditions. 

This camera records 4K at 30FPS, but bear in mind that if you increase the frame rate to 60 then the crop factor does reduce to that of an APS-C sensor. The video features on the Lumix S5 are very impressive. It includes multiple cinematic modes and a slow-motion mode at 180 fps but you lose the autofocus mode. This has been designed for ease of use too, it includes three custom modes that can be configured to the mode dial and the usual P, A, S and M modes plus an iA (intelligent Auto) mode.

[ad_2]

Artist Tim O’Brien Creates Strange And Familiar Surreal Illustrations

[ad_1]



Artist Tim O’Brien creates strange and familiar surreal illustrations. Illustrator and portrait painter Tim O’Brien has a knack for pop culture, often infusing it into artistic visions that simultaneously reveal its strangeness and familiarity. His work has been published most notably in TIME Magazine as well as The Nation, Bloomberg Businessweek, and many more.

Tim has received multiple awards and recognitions from the Society of Illustrators from around the globe. Tim is a professor at Pratt Institute in Brooklyn and frequently lectures across the country. Tim lives in Ditmas Park, Brooklyn, with his wife and son.

Scroll down and inspire yourself. Check Tim’s website for more amazing work and info.

You can find Tim O’Brien on the web:

#1

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#2

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#3

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#4

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#5

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#6

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#7

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#8

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#9

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#10

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#11

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#12

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#13

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#14

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#15

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#16

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#17

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#18

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#19

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien

#20

Surreal Illustrations By Tim O’Brien


Related Articles:







[ad_2]

A Rock-Climbing Engagement Photo Session in the Wissahickon

[ad_1]

News

On their second date, the couple ascended Livezey Rock.


rock-climbing engagement photos

A portrait from Allison Lackman and Eric Moss’ rock-climbing engagement photo session / Photography by Heidi Roland Photography

When planning their Big Days, couples should always select elements that are meaningful to them, and work with their vendor team on bringing them to life. That extends to the pre-wedding festivities, such as proposals and engagement photos, too. This rock-climbing engagement photo session in Wissahickon Valley Park snapped by Heidi Roland Photography is a top example — and a creative way to tell the nature-loving pair’s story. Discover their journey below.

couple portrait

The couple: Allison Lackman, a 30-year-old physical therapist, and Eric Moss, a 34-year-old traffic-control specialist, both of Manayunk

How they met: On their first date in Manayunk, they walked and talked, and soon realized they both enjoy being active and spending time outside. Their second date took them to Livezey Rock, a popular climbing spot in Wissahickon Valley Park, and they spent the next two years going on more adventures together — with the biggest one to come when Eric popped the question.

engagement ring

The proposal: Naturally, Eric proposed during one of their rock-climbing adventures, at Birdsboro Climbing Quarry in Berks County. Eric lead the journey upward and attached the ring to the anchors, so it was out of sight from the ground. Allison climbed up and saw the ring at the top. Made by TDN Créations of Canada, the ring features a tie-in knot — a figure eight — which represents dependability.

The engagement-photo location: The Wissahickon is close to Manayunk and the couple spends a lot of free time exploring the park, so it seemed like the perfect fit for their photos. They also wanted to capture portraits at Livezey Rock because of its significance in their relationship. “It was so much fun and felt natural to take the climbing photos since it is one of our favorite things to do together,” says Allison, who adds that the whole day felt organic and easy. “It was basically Heidi joining us for a typical afternoon in the park and showing her our favorite spots.” The couple even took turns on Livezey Rock’s wall with some younger climbers.

climbingclimbing

Beyond the climbing: The couple also took portraits in places with beautiful views. Some of their favorite photos were of them sitting on a rock in a creek — an impromptu choice. portrait

And the attire: Practicality and function are the couple’s two priorities for any occasion, particularly when climbing. They donned attire suitable for hiking and outdoor fun, and they were glad their photographer did the same.

portrait

The wedding plans: Allison and Eric will say “I do” on April 21st at Valley Green Inn in the heart of the Wissahickon. As for the honeymoon? They’re waiting till after the wedding to plan it — but they expect their outdoor adventures to continue on their trip.

This interview was edited for clarity and length. 

Get more great content from Philadelphia Wedding:
FACEBOOK | INSTAGRAM | NEWSLETTER

Getting married? Start and end your wedding planning journey with Philadelphia Weddings’ guide to the best wedding vendors in the city.





[ad_2]

Friends of the Lake District launches photography competition

[ad_1]

Launched by charity Friends of the Lake District, the 2023 competition needs pictures of the area to star in its 2024 calendar and Christmas cards that go on sale later this year.

Photos of current and previous visits are welcome.

Fundraiser Rachel Dorrington said: “Whether fells, lakes, woodlands, villages, wildlife or something a little bit different, we’d love to see your favourite photos and memories of the Lake District.

Times and Star: June calendar image, Hawkshead by David RippinJune calendar image, Hawkshead by David Rippin (Image: David Rippin)

“Back by popular demand is also the astrophotography, or dark skies photography category, so send us your starry snaps too.”

The charity said all money raised from the sale of the calendars and cards goes towards supporting the Lake District’s world-class landscapes and heritage.

Winners receive a complementary set of Christmas cards and 2024 calendar.

Photos must be submitted via the charity’s website at www.friendsofthelakedistrict.org.uk/photography-competition-2023.



[ad_2]

Explore Boundless Imagination with GODOX AK-R21 Projection Attachment

[ad_1]

Photographers and videographers seeking to take their creativity to new heights need to look no further than the GODOX AK-R21 projection attachment. This revolutionary tool allows users to explore their boundless imagination with complete transparency sets, bringing stunning shapes, colours, and artistic elements to their images.

Compatible with AD200Pro (round head and Fresnel’s head), AD100Pro, V1, and nearly all camera flashes across brands, the AK-R21 is the perfect combination of simplicity and possibility. With dedicated lenses of optional focal length, including a 65mm lens and two additional options at 50mm and 83mm, this attachment is built precisely to eliminate colour aberration from centre to edge, throwing explicit shapes and vivid images as if coming alive.

Turn the barrel to get a sharper or blurrier projection to achieve the ideal effect. Before firing, preview the result with the modelling light or the stroboscopic flash function of your Godox flashes. The projector is 360° rotatable when attached to flashes, and the mounting ring is marked with degree numbers for easy and precise adjustments.

Designed with a universal 1/4-inch mount on the adapters, the AK-R21 can be attached directly to a light stand or a flash. A series of supporting accessories are available to hold and hide the attachment, making it the perfect choice for any genre of photography, from portrait to product to landscape.

The world is your studio, and with the GODOX AK-R21 projection attachment, magical moments happen in a blink. For more information and to purchase the AK-R21, visit https://godox.com/product-b/AK-R21.html.

[ad_2]

‘Fusion of Landscapes’ examines relationship between nature, technology – The Minnesota Daily

[ad_1]

The art exhibit will be featured at the Larson Gallery in the St. Paul Student Center until May 19.

The+exhibit+featured+artwork+ranging+from+pixelated+paintings+to+tinsel+being+blown+by+an+electric+fan+to+a+video+sourcing+footage+from+the+National+Park+Service+and+Google+Earth.

Maddie Robinson

The exhibit featured artwork ranging from pixelated paintings to tinsel being blown by an electric fan to a video sourcing footage from the National Park Service and Google Earth.

“Fusion of Landscapes,” a new art exhibition at the Larson Gallery in the University of Minnesota’s St. Paul Student Center, explores the intersection of natural and technological environments.

The exhibit, which opened on March 16, features artwork by Meagan Marsh Pine and Nick Chatfield-Taylor. The media range from pixelated paintings to tinsel being blown by an electric fan to a video sourcing footage from the National Park Service and Google Earth.

“Fusion of Landscapes” is open until May 19.

Joy Quach, an arts and culture event planner at the gallery, said Pine and Chatfield-Taylor’s installations were chosen out of about 100 submissions by a selection committee. The committee paired their artwork together for the exhibit despite the artists not knowing each other prior.

Lindsey Butler, a gallery attendant, said the committee chose Larson for the exhibit because it is more spacious than other art galleries on campus and could best accommodate the installations. Larson also tends to feature more 3D exhibits to make the most out of the space, and “Fusion of Landscapes” interacts with all of the space offered in the gallery.

On top of the brick towers and wall photography showcased, Teagan Londo, another gallery attendant, said the exhibit is distinct because “it combines elements of audio and video, which we have not had very often.”

Meagan Marsh Pine

Pine, a lecturer of photography at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, said some of their installations were inspired by aerial photography and digital camouflage. Pine wanted to examine the relationship between the two and combine them when making their pixelated paintings featured throughout the gallery.

When creating this exhibit, Pine aimed to reference how landscapes have been built and constructed in society. They said they drew inspiration from visual histories and patterns in landscapes and twisted them to make people question the things they see and “how that positions them as viewers.”

“I was kind of building it off of this visual language that I have been creating,” Pine said. “I’m interested in this duality of real and unreal.”

Pine graduated from the University in 2018 with a Bachelor’s degree in journalism, art and interdisciplinary design, but said they didn’t develop their current style until graduate school. Pine’s work was more photo-centric in their undergraduate years, but they still consider photography to be the “backbone” of their work.

Nick Chatfield-Taylor

Chatfield-Taylor’s tinsel installations, which consist of three pieces of tinsel positioned throughout the gallery with varying amounts of air exposure, originally began as a “happy accident” while he was working on another project in his studio. Since he left the window open, the project began fluttering in the wind, and after, he started to experiment with air as a medium in his artwork.

By contrast, another piece by Chatfield-Taylor called “The Walked Triangle” features photos of a distant hill with a triangle path connecting three bushes. He walked this path daily for at least a month so he could see the path from far away.

“Grass is a worthy adversary,” he joked.

Chatfield-Taylor said Pine’s artwork is very “labor intensive,” while his is more “abstract,” but they both investigate similar concepts and ideas.

“I think Meagan and I are both exploring themes of repetition and the variety of monotony,” Chatfield-Taylor said.

[ad_2]

The Surprising Compatibility of Science and Faith

[ad_1]






© Illustration by The Atlantic. Source: Universal History Archive / Getty


This is an edition of Up for Debate, a newsletter by Conor Friedersdorf. On Wednesdays, he rounds up timely conversations and solicits reader responses to one thought-provoking question. Later, he publishes some thoughtful replies. Sign up for the newsletter here.

Last week I quoted the late astronomer and astrophysicist Carl Sagan on humanity’s place in the cosmos, and asked readers for their thoughts on outer space.

Deb is awestruck:

If I am standing on an orb that spins 1,000 mph while hurtling through space, that is so crazily magical that anything is possible. It’s all so phenomenal and, by extension, so is our existence.  

Robert, a graduate student in philosophy, harkened back to the ancients:

Like Aristotle, when I was very young, I thought the planets and stars in the sky were something like gods. I don’t think this anymore, of course. Nevertheless, they are in some sense above and beyond us, endowed with a sort of beauty we ourselves are incapable of manufacturing. I simply do not know how someone can gaze at the images from, for instance, the James Webb Space Telescope and think otherwise. Even without technology, there is something marvelous about gazing into the sky and noticing just how much is out there. Thousands of stars, five planets, and even our own galaxy are visible from Earth with the naked eye. Light pollution has crowded out quite a bit of this. But even just a few stars, or a few planets, is enough to see the vastness of it all.

Still, despite the enormous powers of these celestial spheres, they cannot appreciate their own beauty. Humans alone are known to be capable of appreciating the universe in this way. This has always made me ascribe special status to humans, and to think that human concerns are of special importance. I don’t take this to be inconsistent with the scale of it all, but rather a result of it. If we aren’t here anymore, the all the beauty in the universe won’t mean anything to anyone. So something of enormous value would be lost.

I worry that, for all the good that scientific advancements have done for us in understanding space, we’re starting to see the universe as nothing more than a collection of big rocks and balls of gas; these days, the planets and the stars, particularly the moon and Mars, tend to be objects of escapist fantasies more than objects of wonder.

This is a mistake, even for those who think the future of humanity may be space colonization. The beauty of the universe cannot be captured by an exhaustive description of its mechanics or of its utility to us. To think this, rather than appreciating the literally otherworldly nature of outer space, is, I think, the wrong kind of anthropocentrism. The majesty of the heavens has inspired joy, wonder, and creativity in human minds for as long as we have existed, and their beauty is divine. So, I figure, why not let myself think, along with Aristotle, that, even if not literally, the first people were right in thinking that the planets “are gods, and that the divine encloses the whole of nature”?

Rob’s life has coincided with the rise and fall of the space program:

Outer space pervaded the national consciousness—especially if you were young. It seemed that everyone followed NASA takeoffs and felt nothing but pride and awe. Over time, there has been a debate over the trade-off and cost of these efforts. We are reminded that there are plenty of problems back here on Earth that deserve these same funds.

At its best and at its most essential, space exploration is a tribute to the curiosity of the human mind, a mind that keeps expanding, keeps pushing, keeps seeking answers to its existence. To look at the sky and not wonder what exists “out there” is, I submit, to not be human, and we should not lose sight of the fact that our minds are naturally beamed up.

Our consciousness is ineluctably drawn deeper and deeper toward solving the riddles of our existence. On Star Trek, Captain Kirk was tapping into this collective consciousness when he famously said: “To explore strange new worlds. To seek out new life and new civilizations. To boldly go where no man has gone before.” As humans, we can’t help ourselves. To some extent, we won’t be able to not continue to explore “up there.” If our sight and the human quest were to remain solely limited to this rock of ours, we would no longer be human. “Thrusters ahead, Mr. Sulu. Take us out.” Onward.

Joseph remarks on the fragility of life:

Having just passed my 77th year of breathing, I can truthfully say that the awesomeness of our universe’s extent continues to astound me almost daily. I am blessed to have been given a firmer understanding than many of where it actually is that we dwell. But I also look at the utterly ruthless nature of the universe’s hurricane, within the eye of which, by the merest happenstance, we happen to reside.

It unnerves me how few have any idea just how frail a construct all of life’s continued existence is, let alone life that possesses the ability to think, comprehend, and respond to the vast wonder of reality. Thus, counterbalancing the awe is the abject sense of dread that we stand so very close to losing all of the ground we’ve gained, not just as rational beings but as the life force itself. I find myself praying to the merest myth of a Supreme Being that somehow, in spite of the odds, we successfully make it off of our beautiful blue dot, spreading in a diaspora far, far out into the nearly unfathomable depths that surround us.

Kara found the physics of space to be beyond her grasp, but not its significance:

I’ve always been fascinated by space, but was discouraged by my efforts to study it as a secondary-school science student, unable to grasp the complex physics involved in astronomy. But as a history and research teacher, I can see through Galileo’s telescope, sit in Albert Einstein’s clerk office, be as a pebble upon the shore with Isaac Newton, and marvel at the night sky with hunter-gatherers, forming entire cosmologies based around the sky. From that perspective, I have learned to be constantly awed by what we know of the universe, how we know it, and to follow closely our potential connections with it.  

Carl Sagan has helped immensely in shaping my appreciation, and has taken me on planetary journeys through time and space that I never imagined when I was younger.  

The most recent space-related joy of my life was taking my 3-year-old son to the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., for the first time, in January, and seeing his wonder and curiosity as he looked at the models of the planets and “flew on a spaceship” in the planetarium. Jupiter is his current favorite, and we will continue talking about the planets and space for as long as he can put up with my enthusiasm. I can’t wait to introduce him to Star Trek.

Ben, a man of faith and science, reflects on the biggest and smallest questions:

To explain how I feel about outer space and how it shapes my worldview, I have to start with one of my favorite Bible verses: “When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained; What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour” (Psalm 8:3-5, KJV).

Although I’m a graduate student in theoretical particle physics, not astronomy, both give me a similar feeling: that we human beings are set among a seemingly unfathomable universe, one that I believe is divinely created for us, and despite our tiny size among the cosmos, we can begin to comprehend it. With our God-given reason (one of the things that I believe makes us “in the image of God”), we can model and measure things like black-hole collisions and the afterglow of the Big Bang despite our tiny position among it all.

Understanding physics and astronomy is the closest I believe any human can come to doing magic, and taking something that seems impossible to know, like measuring the speed of distant stars and galaxies, yet making sense of it, is an incredible feeling. When I consider this in the context of my faith, I believe that understanding the laws and behavior of the universe is one of the few times we can directly observe God’s handiwork. Indeed, looking up at the night sky, I see that humanity is “crowned with glory and honour.”

Despite sharing Carl Sagan’s sense of awe, I strongly disagree with significant parts of his prescription for how we should be humbled by our tiny place in the universe. No one claimed humanity is special because of its size. We human beings are tiny, but the things that make us uniquely human—our curiosity, reason, and understanding—stretch across the limits of the physically observable universe. Because I believe the universe was intentionally created for us, I also believe its physical laws were made by God for us to discover. So, as a theoretical physicist in training, I intend to take God up on his offer.

But there are still things in science that make me humbled about humanity’s place in the universe; they’re just in quantum mechanics, not astronomy. For all that astronomy gives me pride in when it comes to what humans have been able to understand, quantum mechanics throws “understanding” back in my face and, like God speaking to Job out of the storm in Job 38, tells me that there was never any promise that the universe was made so a human mind would be able to comprehend all of it.

What I value in humanity is not our size, but our minds (among other things), so when physics tells me that our understanding has seemingly insurmountable limits, that is when I’m humbled by our place in the universe. Outer space gives me pride in humanity’s scientific power and understanding; it gives me something visible that I can begin to wrap my head around and beautiful images that let me soak in the glory of creation. The realm of the very tiny is what inspires in me fear and trembling at God’s work and at human limits.

Elena recalls a month-long trip to Crete when she was young:

We had a nightly ritual: We unrolled orange paisley sleeping bags at the edge of a sandy beach. Impatiently, we waited for dusk to snuff out the deep blue of the sea into a charcoal gray and to cover the sky in a drop cloth of dappled disarray. My mother read chapters out of Gerald Durrell’s My Family and Other Animals to my siblings and me under a canopy of brilliant stars that reached far into the dusty nebulas and galaxies that shot across the hot August skies. I listened to sentences and phrases and let them mingle with Cassiopeia, weave their way through the dippers of the Great and Little Bears, and imprint with Sirius, steadfast and comfortable as a night-light. The backdrop of a billion stars cleared and prepped the imagination for story listening, and then soon, when the lure of an astronomy lesson proved too irresistible, the science lecture. Eventually, my eyes closed against my will, fatigued from the trip across the universe, but the comfort of that wide open yet protective dome covered me like a blanket.

Omar is a city dweller who yearns for a better view of the heavens:

Turn your gaze in any direction and you’ll find yourself surrounded by mammoth buildings and skyscrapers. At night, the light that emanates from these towering steel structures creates a kind of muted haze, a veil separating us from any clear vantage of our solar system. The city can be suffocating and claustrophobic even without our realizing that this unnatural buffer exists between us and the cosmos. It’s only when I realize that the stars lay hidden from our view that I begin to ponder the effect of this profound absence. A city, with its shining beacons and glowing aura, is nothing more than our desperate attempt to preserve human egotism at the cost of our relationship to nature and the universe.

Can you imagine if we had access to the stars? The cosmos in its incalculable vastness is indeed a source of wonder and inspiration, but it is also a humbling endeavor to witness. It’s a reminder that our individual concerns and fears, hopes and aspirations, biases and egotism are nothing compared with the grand scale of the universe. A city, despite its dense population and variability, can be an isolating place. But the night sky would be there to remind us that there is something bigger connecting us all together.  

Having grown up in New York City, it’s difficult to imagine having any kind of relationship with the cosmos. But if we could, I believe that we would all benefit.  

Chadd recommends buying a telescope:

Nine years ago I got a small $75 telescope as a gift for a young family friend. Getting it set up and looking at the moon for the first time, I was awestruck. I just couldn’t believe how beautiful, how crisp, how very real and solid it looked through a lens. At first I thought, Light pollution here is bad; probably won’t be able to see much, but I was dead wrong. Once I learned how to find Jupiter, I saw its moons and the Great Red Spot, then Saturn and the rings. I was totally hooked.

When the friend lost interest, I ventured on. What started as a $75 cheapie telescope turned into a couple-thousand-dollar hobby that my girlfriend at the time called my “other girlfriend.” I was out there every night for months, then sporadically, during times of cool celestial sightings, back out there until 4 a.m.

I slowly amassed a six-inch reflector telescope on a computerized mount that tracks the Earth’s rotation and can find objects through a GPS unit. By that point, I’d learned to easily find and photograph the planets. One of the last and best cosmic events I got to witness was the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction a few years ago. A once-in-nearly-800- years event, it was biblical in a sense, and I got a picture of it! Tiny Jupiter and tiny Saturn with its rings. Breathtaking. Truly! My entire family lined up to see it—my own little star party—and I was quite proud to show everyone.

Mind you, I eventually maxed out what I was able to see, so I slowed my roll. At this point, the maybe $6,000 it will cost me to upgrade to better gear is too high, so the telescope rarely comes out. But I was going through some tough stuff during my amateur astrophotography hobby, and it was a beautiful distraction. I didn’t truly comprehend the size of the universe until I was staring at it through a tube. It’s amazing what you can see right from your backyard, and the feeling you get seeing it, through your own eyes, is indescribable.

Glenn was a pastor in Houston near NASA’s Johnson Space Center:

About 75 percent of our church worked in the aerospace industry. It was an interesting experience leading triple-redundancy NASA engineers to “live and walk by faith.” This truth was made clear early on, when I showed up with a group of our church members for a service project one Saturday morning. We were going to reroof an elderly lady’s home. Before I climbed on the roof, I was met with a long, complex spreadsheet explaining in great detail what every person would be doing in 15-minute increments throughout the day. So this is how NASA nails on shingles!

A group of the engineers’ spouses good-naturedly cornered me the next day at church. “Have you ever watched The Big Bang Theory?” they asked with a bemused grin. No, I had not. “Well, you should,” was their advice, “because that’s who we married and who you are now, pastor.” That was not exactly correct, but most comedy is an exaggeration of stereotypes.

We have been told that science and faith are incompatible. In fact, there is a vibrant faith community in and around NASA doing the hard work of science. I was having lunch with an astronaut a few weeks after his return from the International Space Station. “You know, I looked out into the void of space,” he said, “and it was black, white, cold, and lonely. And then I looked down at Earth and it was bright green and blue with swirls of white—warm, inviting, and interesting. I decided if I could choose to be any place in the universe, it would be right there on Earth.”  

Barbara hopes for alien contact:

The one thing that would bring all people on our planet together relatively quickly would be to begin communicating with sentient life from other galaxies. I feel grateful to be of a sentient race and would welcome meeting other sentients from across the universe. My hope is that we develop the strength of character and mind, and bigness of heart, to connect with other life forms before we destroy ourselves and our planet. To stop outer-space exploration would be a travesty to our species and the species we have not met yet.

[ad_2]