Which Sony A7 camera? How to choose the right model

[ad_1]

In the early days of the Sony Alpha A7-series there was the A7, the A7R and the A7S. Things were quite simple. The A7S was the one for video, the A7R was the high-resolution model and the A7 was the more affordable option. It was fairly easy to choose the right camera.

The situation has got a bit more complicated since then. We’ve had the introduction of the Mark II and Mark III versions of each camera and Mark IV version of the A7R and A7, and now the Sony A7R V has arrived.

And let’s not forget the Sony A7C.

So how do you know which is the best Sony A7 camera to choose when there are so many available new and secondhand? Well, in some ways the original distinguishing features still help.

For a deeper dive into the many different camera types and features available, check out our range of camera buying guides.

Which Sony A7 Camera: Sony A7R III

Sony A7R series = High Resolution

With 61 million effective pixels on their full-frame sensors, the Sony A7R IV and Sony A7R V are the highest resolution cameras in the A7 range. Their high pixel counts enable the two camera to capture a huge amount of detail and, thanks to Sony’s fantastic sensor-building knowhow and the BSI design, noise is controlled well. That said, we’d recommend making ISO 12,800 the top value you use if possible.

Meanwhile, the 42.4Mp A7R III has the same sensor as the A7R II. Both of them resolve more detail than the original A7R which has a 36.4Mp sensor, but they can’t match the A7R IV or A7R V.

Where the A7R III scores over the A7R II for image quality is with the improved dynamic range at the lower sensitivity settings. However, we’re only talking about around 0.5EV. And while that could be significant for landscape photography, if you use ND grads or composite images, then it’s not THAT big a deal.

The A7R III also feels more rounded than the models that go before it. Its autofocusing system is impressive so it’s even suitable for shooting sport. The very best focusing system, however, is in the A7R V which has 693 phase detection points and the very latest subject detection options which include Human (Right/Left Eye Select) / Animal (Right/Left Eye Select) / Bird / Insect / Car / Train / Airplane, all of which work in stills and video mode.

Sony has improved the handling of each successive model. Consequently, the A7R V’s handling is significantly better than the A7R’s and quite a bit better than the A7R IV’s. Sony’s most recent camera feature a touch-screen, but Sony only made full use of it with the A7R V. With the A7R IV and A7R III, it’s only really useful for zooming in and out of images or setting the AF point.

There’s also a joystick that simplifies setting the AF point on the A7R III, A7R IV and A7R V. Of course, if you shoot still life, macro or landscape photography that may not be a major issue for you. This is a bit fatter and easier to find on the A7R IV and A7R V than the Mark III camera.

Another significant change that Sony has made with the A7R V in comparison with earlier models is that as well as being slightly larger (3.2-inches vs 3-inches) and higher-resolution (2,095,104-dots vs 1,440,000-dots), the A7R V’s screen is mounted on a 4-way tilting mechanism. It’s like a tilting and vari-angle screen combined whereas the A7R IV has a standard tilting screen.

Get the best deals on the full range of Sony A7R cameras at Amazon UK and Amazon US.

Which is the best Sony A7R-series camera?

If you find the Sony A7R available at a bargain price, it’s worth considering, but it wouldn’t be our first choice of the A7R-series cameras. Its AF system isn’t a patch on the latest version and the handling can get annoying. The Eye AF (human and animal) that’s available with the A7R III and A7R IV, is superb, but if you want it to work for humans in video you’ll have to opt for the A7R IV or A7R V. The new Sony A7R V makes some very nice upgrades on the A7R IV, including the ability to set the subject tracking to Human (Right/Left Eye Select) / Animal (Right/Left Eye Select) / Bird / Insect / Car / Train / Airplane.

If you don’t need quick AF point selection and the fastest focusing, nor the improved dynamic range, then the A7R II looks like a good solid proposition. It also makes a significant saving on the A7R III. However, if you can afford it, the A7R IV captures a lot more detail and is more affordable than the newer A7R V.

We haven’t finalised our full Sony A7R V review yet, but we’re already confident that it’s one of the very best cameras out there.

Sony A7S-series = Video

While the A7S, A7S II and A7S III are intended as the video cameras, Sony hasn’t stinted on the video features of the A7R II, A7R III, A7R IV, A7R V and A7 III. However, where the A7S models win is with their low-light capability. They all have a native sensitivity that tops out at ISO 102,400.

Their low (12Mp) pixel counts mean that they handle noise extremely well.

What the A7S and A7S II don’t do well in low light, however, is focus. That’s not an issue for many videographers who routinely focus manually, but it’s a little behind the times. Thankfully, the Sony A7S III addresses this. It has a Hybrid AF system with 759 phase-detection points and 425 contrast-detection points, Real Time Eye AF (Human and Animal) for stills and video. Its AF system is also claimed to operate at down to -6EV.

Naturally, if you’re considering an A7S series camera, video is your primary concern. The A7S and A7S II are both proven in this area and deliver great quality results. But the A7S III is a more capable 4K camera.

It has full-sensor readout and can shoot 4K video at up to 120p or full HD footage at up to 240p, with full-sensor readout no pixel-binning and with the hybrid autofocus system in action.

There’s also 10-bit colour depth and 4:2:2 colour sampling available in all recording formats.

In addition, Sony has introduced new/improved codecs including XAVC S-I 4K (All-Intra), XAVC HS 4K (Long GOP) and XAVC S 4K (Long GOP), plus there’s S-Log2 and S-Log3 and improved S-Gamut3 and S-Gamut3.Cine colour science.

The A7S III also supports 16-bit raw video output to an external recorder via HDMI – that’s a first for the A7S-series. The output is full-frame 4264 x 2408 16-bit with a choice of 59.94p/50p/29.97p/25p/23.98p frame rates and colour spaces.

Sony has also upgraded the A7S III’s dual card slots so that as well as SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-II media, they can accept the new CFexpress Type A cards. These cards are required to get the top-quality results in the enhanced S&Q (Slow and Quick) modes.

Sony has also responded to one of the biggest requests made for the A7S III and given it a vari-angle touchscreen. That means it’s easier to see the scene then you’re shooting above or below head-height, and for many, makes an external monitor unnecessary.

If you like the idea of a vari-angle screen for vlogging but you’re not sure keen on the A7S III’s price tag, take a look at the Sony A7C. Announced in September last year, it has a first-rate 24Mp full-frame sensor, the Bionz X processing engine and excellent autofocusing capability along with a reasonable video specification. There’s no raw video capability but you shoot high-quality 4K footage in S-Log2 or S-Log3.

However, Sony hasn’t given the A7C the A7S III’s revised menu structure or its excellent touch-control. Also as a 0.39-inch type, A7C’s viewfinder is also pretty small for a full-frame camera.

Get the best deals on the full range of Sony A7S series cameras at Amazon UK and Amazon US.

 

Which is the best Sony A7S-series camera?

With the Sony A7S III now on the market, there are likely to be some bargains available on the A7S II. That camera has been doing a great job for many videographers and the A7S III doesn’t make an upgrade in resolution. Where it wins, however, is with the improved handling and feature set that should make creating great 4K video that bit easier.

You can order the Sony A7S III from Adorama in the US and Wex Photo Video in the UK.

Which Sony Alpha A7 Camera?

 

Sony A7 series = The Affordable Option

While the A7 II was pretty decent, the Sony A7 III is much better. What’s more, at launch Sony priced it quite aggressively for a full-frame camera at £2000/$1,998 (body only) or £2,500/$2,198 with the 28-70mm lens. However, its price has fallen since launch.

 

Those are still not figures to be sniffed at, but that money brings you a very capable AF system, that’s streets ahead of the A7’s and A7 II’s. It also brings improved handling with the mini-joystick control, a touch-screen and twin card ports.

The A7 III’s full-frame sensor also has a pixel count of 24.2 million, which as well as being a popular figure, allows a good balance between detail resolution, file size and noise control. Add in 4K (3840 x 2160) video recording with S-Log plus a battery that has a much longer life than the A7 II’s and the Mark III looks like an easy decision.

On 21st October 2021, the Sony A7 IV was unveiled to the world and it makes some significant steps up in comparison with the A7III. Most notably, the A7 IV has a 33Mp Exmor R BSI (backside illuminated) CMOS sensor which means its pixel count is 36% higher than the A7 III’s.

Sony has also paired the A7 IV’s sensor with its latest Bionz XR processor, previously seen in the Sony A7S III and Sony A1. This extra processing power enables the A7 IV to have the same native sensitivity range (ISO 100-51,200) despite its hike in resolution.

The maximum continuous shooting rate is also the same at 10fps.

 

Another area where the Sony A7 IV distinguishes itself from the A7 III is with the autofocus system. That’s because the A7 IV has Real-time Tracking AF and Eye AF from humans, animals and birds for both stills and movies.

The A7 III gained real-time AF for animals but not birds with a firmware update and only for stills, not video.

So far we’ve only been able to shoot a few images for our early Sony A7 IV review, but the Eye AF seems more responsive with humans and animals than the A7III.

On the video front the headline figures for the A7IV are 4K recording in XAVC S-I format at up to 60fps with 10-bit 4:2:2 colour to either an on-board memory card or via HDMI to a recorder.

The 4K 30p video is oversampled from 7K using the full-frame, but 4K 60p is oversampled from 4.8K in Super 35 (APS-C) mode so there’s a 1.5x crop.

That’s a nice improvement on the A7 III which doesn’t have 10-bit colour nor 4K 60p capability and applies a 1.2x crop to 4K 30p footage.

While the specification improvements might not seem dramatic to some, the handling of the A7IV is dramatically enhanced. For a start, the electronic viewfinder has a nice boost in resolution as it’s a 3.69-million-dot unit rather than a 2.36-million-dot device, and it has a refresh rate of up to 120fps.

In addition, the A7 IV has a 3-inch 1,036,800-dot vari-angle screen rather than a tilting screen. This makes it much more versatile and it can be angled to help with portrait orientation shooting as well as landscape. It can even be flipped round for vlogging and shooting selfies.

Sony has also given the A7IV the revised menu arrangement that first appeared on the A7S III and later the A1. It’s considerably more user-friendly than the old menu system.

Sony also has another ‘affordable’ full-frame camera, the A7C, which is a bit more compact. However, its current street price is around the same as the A7 III’s and although it brings a vari-angle screen, in other respects it’s not quite so well specified. Unless you really want a vari-angle screen, we’d recommend going for the A7 III, but if you can afford it, the Sony A7 IV has the best of both worlds.

Get the best deals on the full range of Sony A7 series cameras at Amazon UK and Amazon US.

Which is the best Sony A7-series camera?

The Sony A7 III can be bought for around £1,699/$1,998, which is temptingly below the £2,499/$2,498 launch price of the A7 IV. But as well as the resolution boost and improvement to the AF system, the new camera makes some very nice upgrades to the handling so we’d be sorely tempted to save a little longer.

Which Sony A7 camera should you choose?

If you’re still not sure about which Sony A7 camera is best for you at this stage and you’re desparate to make purchase, plump for the A7 IV. It’s a great all-rounder and it’s designed with enthusiast photographers in mind. It’s a camera with all of the specification you need right now, plus plenty of room to grow with.

With the A7 IV, you’ll be able to shoot a wide range of subjects including fast-moving sport and action. Noise is also controlled well and the level of detail in images won’t disappoint.

If you’re keen to get more resolution then the A7R V is the best choice and its AF system is incredible. If video is your primary concern then go for the Sony A7S III.

Of course, if you’re really torn and you feel you might need to be able to combine high-resolution stills shooting with high-speed, blistering AF and 16-bit raw video recording, the 50Mp Sony A1 is the camera for you. It is currently available for £6,500 / $6,500 but it looks like the camera that will see many professional photographers, including sports, wedding and journalist photographers switch to mirrorless photography.

Which Sony Alpha A7 camera? How to choose the right model

Article Name

Which Sony Alpha A7 camera? How to choose the right model

Description

With 8 Sony Alpha A7-series cameras available, you might be wondering which one to buy. We take you through the options to help you choose the right A7-series camera for you and your photography.

Author

Angela Nicholson

Publisher Name

Camera Jabber

Publisher Logo

[ad_2]

What’s in my bag: pro wildlife photographer Katie Mayhew

[ad_1]

There is no right answer when it comes to choosing the right kit. What works for you might hinder someone else and vice versa, it really all comes down to what you’re shooting and what your preferences are. 

Wildlife photographer and videographer Katie Mayhew is a veteran in her field and during her time working for the BBC, Channel 4 and Netflix, she would’ve used a wide variety of different kit. Her current preferred setup however includes the powerful Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro 4.6K G2 camera – a video focussed cine camera with 15 stops of dynamic range, a super 35mm 4.6K sensor and the ability to shoot 2K at up to 300fps which is super slow motion.

[ad_2]

Maker Faire Orlando celebrating 10th anniversary this weekend – Orlando Sentinel

[ad_1]

Creators, dreamers, artists and do-it-yourselfers of all ages and backgrounds will gather this weekend for a celebration of grassroots innovation and homegrown ingenuity.

Maker Faire Orlando celebrates its 10th anniversary during the two-day festival at Central Florida Fairgrounds Nov. 5-6. The event showcases the creativity of Florida’s maker community through hands-on demonstrations and activities for the entire family.

Cosplay, in particular, will take the spotlight at this year’s gathering with costume makers showing off their handmade props and attire.

Maker Faire Orlando features activities such as power racing.

“Especially for the artists in the cosplay community, what they like is the opportunity to show their craft more so than just exhibiting the final product,” said Ian Cole, the Orlando event’s founder. “There are a lot of mentors in our crowd, a lot of people who will help someone else get started and learn.”

Cole was inspired to create this forum for Orlando’s maker community after visiting a similar event in California.

“I took my oldest son, who was 11 at the time, to Bay Area Maker Faire in San Francisco in 2011, and we both left so pumped up and amazed and excited. There’s that feeling when you meet your tribe,” Cole said. “We thought 300 people would show up and it would be a fun party with our friends and 2,500 people showed up the first year.”

That’s when Cole became an “accidental event producer” and knew the festival would persist.

“Makers feel like everyone is a maker,” he said. “For us to connect different communities and have them show off their craft, and get new people into their communities, it’s just super rewarding.”

Maker Faire Orlando allows makers of all ages to learn with hands-on exhibits.
Things to Do

Things to Do

Weekly

A look at entertainment and sporting events in Orlando and around Central Florida.

Asher Adams remembers the first Orlando mini Maker Faire when he showcased a PVC instrument that resembled something the Blue Man Group might play. In recent years, his interest has pivoted to photography.

Asher Adams will showcase his astrophotography at Maker Faire Orlando Nov. 5-6.

“During the pandemic, I started taking interest in backyard astrophotography. It was something that was really easy and accessible to do from home,” Adams said. “I fell down that rabbit hole of learning everything you can do to capture the night sky from home, which was really cool.”

At Maker Faire Orlando, Adams will return for the first time in nearly a decade to display his astrophotography rig and answer questions for aspiring shutterbugs.

“Even if it’s just doing stuff with your iPhone, there are so many good resources between your camera, star charts and apps,” he said. “I’m excited to be back and excited to hopefully help people learn about the night sky.”

A decade into this festival’s Central Florida tenure, organizers anticipate 10,000 attendees and 250 exhibits including power racing, combat robots, learn to solder, take-it-apart and make-a-shirt. Other exhibits allow visitors to experience drones, daleks, belt sander racing and homemade creations of all kinds.

“Some people are looking for a hobby, some people are looking for their next business venture. It’s a great place to come feel the vibe where anything is possible if you set your mind to it,” Cole said. “You have this amazing group of creative, innovative people all in one space. You can’t go wrong with a crowd like that.”

Maker Faire Orlando features hands-on exhibits at the Central Florida Fairgrounds.
  • When: 10 a.m.-5 p.m. Nov. 5-6
  • Where: 4603 W. Colonial Drive in Orlando
  • Tickets: $15 for youth and students and $20 for adults in advance; $20 for youth and students and $25 for adults once the event begins. First responders, active military and veterans, employees of schools, colleges, universities, home-school educators and libraries receive free admission.
  • Parking: On-site parking is free.
  • Food: Vendors are available at the festival.
  • More information: makerfaireorlando.com

Find me @PConnPie on Twitter and Instagram or send me an email: [email protected]. For more fun things, follow @fun.things.orlando on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter.

Alex & Caroline | Caroline Logan Photography

[ad_1]

Fb-Button

It was a beauuutiful fall day with plenty of sunshine and I just couldn’t have been more honored to be Alex & Caroline’s photographer. <3 Their day was an exact depiction of who they are… easy-going, full of laughter, and so much joy.

 

One of my favorite things about being a wedding photographer is watching the way each couple of mine is cherished and celebrated by their very favorite people… and Alex & Caroline were no exception! Makes me SO happy because they’re just the kind of people that deserve the world. <3

 

Alex & Caroline, may these photos forever bring you back to the day your marriage began… I’m so honored to have been the one to document each moment! Sending hugs! Xo

 













































































For Photographers: Love creamy skintones & soft colors? Learn to edit light & airy here!



[ad_2]

Source link

UK Biobank retinal imaging grading: methodology, baseline characteristics and findings for common ocular diseases

[ad_1]

  • Fight For Sight. Time to focus. 2020. https://www.fightforsight.org.uk/media/3302/time-to-focus-report.pdf.

  • GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators & Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9:e144–e160.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yau JWY, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux EL, Kowalski JW, Bek T, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:556–64.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40–50.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmin DL, Silverstein SM. Visual impairment and mental health: unmet needs and treatment options. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckl, N. Z.). 2020;14:4229–51.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortuem K, Fasler K, Charnley A, Khambati H, Fasolo S, Katz M, et al. Implementation of medical retina virtual clinics in a tertiary eye care referral centre. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:1391–5.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SK, Fu DJ, Faes L, Liu X, Huemer J, Khalid H, et al. Insights into systemic disease through retinal imaging-based oculomics. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:6.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua SYL, Thomas D, Allen N, Lotery A, Desai P, Patel P, et al. Cohort profile: design and methods in the eye and vision consortium of UK Biobank. BMJ open. 2019;9:e025077.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Biobank. UK Biobank research ethics approval. 2021. https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/learn-more-about-uk-biobank/about-us/ethics.

  • Kuan V, Denaxas S, Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Direk K, Bhatti O, Husain S, et al. A chronological map of 308 physical and mental health conditions from 4 million individuals in the English National Health Service. Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1:e63–e77.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:238–42.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau WM. The targets r package: a dynamic make-like function-oriented pipeline toolkit for reproducibility and high-performance computing. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6:2959.

  • Landau WM. Tarchetypes: archetypes for targets. 2021. https://docs.ropensci.org/tarchetypes/.

  • Blischak JD, Carbonetto P, Stephens M. Creating and sharing reproducible research code the workflowr way. F1000Res. 2019;8:1749.

  • Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4:1686.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick A. Ukbwranglr: functions to load and wrangle UK Biobank data. 2022. https://rmgpanw.github.io/ukbwranglr/.

  • Warwick A. Codemapper: functions for mapping between clinical coding systems. 2022. https://rmgpanw.github.io/codemapper/.

  • Patil I. Visualizations with statistical details: the ’ggstatsplot’ approach. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6:3167.

  • Xie Y. Knitr: a general-purpose package for dynamic report generation in r. 2022. https://yihui.org/knitr/.

  • Sjoberg DD, Whiting K, Curry M, Lavery JA, Larmarange J. Reproducible summary tables with the gtsummary package. R J. 2021;13:570–80.

  • Gohel D. Flextable: functions for tabular reporting. 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=flextable.

  • Desai P, Minassian DC, Reidy A, Allen N, Sudlow C. Number of incident cases of the main eye diseases of ageing in the UK Biobank cohort, projected over a 25-year period from time of recruitment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:1533–7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CMG, Klein R, Cheng C-Y, et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e106–116.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Meuer SM, Myers CE, Buitendijk GHS, Rochtchina E, Choudhury F, et al. Harmonizing the classification of age-related macular degeneration in the three-continent AMD consortium. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014;21:14–23.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandl C, Zimmermann ME, Günther F, Barth T, Olden M, Schelter SC, et al. On the impact of different approaches to classify age-related macular degeneration: results from the German AugUR study. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8675.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris FL, Wilkinson CP, Bird A, Chakravarthy U, Chew E, Csaky K, et al. Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:844–51.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, Franke T, Cantor LB, Martone J, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1499–504.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestri G, Williams MA, McAuley C, Oakes K, Sillery E, Henderson DC, et al. Drusen prevalence and pigmentary changes in Caucasians aged 18-54 years. Eye (Lond, Engl). 2012;26:1357–62.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachat AP, Hyman L, Leske MC, Connell AM, Wu SY. Features of age-related macular degeneration in a black population. The Barbados Eye Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol (Chic, Ill 1960). 1995;113:728–35.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressler NM, Bressler SB, West SK, Fine SL, Taylor HR. The grading and prevalence of macular degeneration in Chesapeake Bay watermen. Arch Ophthalmol (Chic, Ill: 1960). 1989;107:847–52.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch IC, Sander B, Kessel L, Hougaard JL, Taarnhøj NCBB, Sørensen TIA, et al. Heredity of small hard drusen in twins aged 20-46 years. Investigative Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:833–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg MA, Tolentino MJ, Miller S, Berson EL, Gaudio AR. Hyperopia and neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1009–13.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikram MK, van Leeuwen R, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, de Jong PTVM. Relationship between refraction and prevalent as well as incident age-related maculopathy: the Rotterdam Study. Investigative Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3778–82.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavanya R, Kawasaki R, Tay WT, Cheung GCM, Mitchell P, Saw S-M, et al. Hyperopic refractive error and shorter axial length are associated with age-related macular degeneration: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Investigative Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6247–52.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas JB, Nangia V, Kulkarni M, Gupta R, Khare A. Associations of early age-related macular degeneration with ocular and general parameters. The Central India Eyes and Medical Study. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2012;90:e185–191.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang J, Zhong X, Tian Z, Wu P, Zhao W, et al. Refractive error and risk of early or late age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90897.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1661–9.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Wolfs RC, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in The Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1851–5.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, Xian WX, Wright L, Courtney P. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:17–21.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Wang Q. Hypertension and retinopathy, arteriolar narrowing, and arteriovenous nicking in a population. Arch Ophthalmol (Chic, Ill: 1960). 1994;112:92–98.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank RN. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:48–58.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsen G, Peto T, Lindekleiv H, Schirmer H, Solbu MD, Toft I, et al. Tromsø eye study: prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2013;91:716–21.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnlaugsdottir E, Halldorsdottir S, Klein R, Eiriksdottir G, Klein BE, Benediktsson R, et al. Retinopathy in old persons with and without diabetes mellitus: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility–Reykjavik Study (AGES-R). Diabetologia. 2012;55:671–80.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamparter J, Raum P, Pfeiffer N, Peto T, Höhn R, Elflein H, et al. Prevalence and associations of diabetic retinopathy in a large cohort of prediabetic subjects: the Gutenberg Health Study. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28:482–7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, King WN, Clegg LX, Klein R, Cooper LS, et al. Methods for evaluation of retinal microvascular abnormalities associated with hypertension/sclerosis in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2269–80.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vujosevic S, Benetti E, Massignan F, Pilotto E, Varano M, Cavarzeran F, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:111–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Poplin R, Varadarajan AV, Blumer K, Liu Y, McConnell MV, Corrado GS, et al. Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2:158–64.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rim TH, Lee G, Kim Y, Tham Y-C, Lee CJ, Baik SJ, et al. Prediction of systemic biomarkers from retinal photographs: development and validation of deep-learning algorithms. Lancet Digital Health. 2020;2:e526–e536.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Gulshan V, Rahimy E, Karth P, Widner K, Corrado GS, et al. Grader variability and the importance of reference standards for evaluating machine learning models for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1264–72.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • [ad_2]

    Source link

    Dreamy Lake Powell/Glen Canyon Dreamscape – David Lane Astrophotography

    [ad_1]

    Once upon a viewpoint dreamy. As Jimmy and I crested the hill that led to this Lake Powell overlook I was on the handsfree phone discussing some matter of import. I explained that I was driving up to the edge of a cliff. As the landscape in this image popped into view before me. I gasped and let out a cry, “Oh My Gawd! Holy Sh#t!!” Convinced I was about to fall to my death the reply “Should I call 911?” was answered with “No, OMG what a view!” It was hard to parse and describe in the English language. It was as if some watery Martain scene had just popped into existence. 

    Check out the video below of this very spot at Glen Canyon/Lake Powell remembering that one it was very windy and two the sun was very bright and washes out the color in the video. In person, the coloration of this image is very close to what you would see at dusk. What I couldn’t see at the time was that Page Arizona just a few Miles to the Southwest was going to cast a ton of light pollution on the crags below me. Even at night as I sat there it wasn’t apparent that there was any light at all on the rock faces below me. 

    The camera told a completely different story, however. Even with an in-camera light pollution filter that is very effective, the cliff faces shown with a neon yellow. I loved the photo in camera but I wasn’t certain I could deal with that level of intense light pollution. I managed to get it almost completely under control eventually, as a matter of fact, I added a bit back as it gave a very interesting bit of contrast.

    If you look carefully, you can see little dots of light on the lake. These are not stars as the wind was still slightly breezy but the flashing lights of very distant boats. Apart from the stars, it was the only light you could perceive with your eyes. Distant disembodied blinking in what otherwise looked like a slightly luminescent outline of a lake.

    I think I’m finally starting to get what I want with my images. I feel like I’m getting a handle on how to make images I’m proud to present to people as art. Art that shows a detailed scene and yet challenges the senses. I hope you will enjoy my evolution and journey to produce an ever better image to share with you, my friends. Clear skies and dark nights to us all. 

     

    EXIF 80 images stitched 8×10 ISO 8000 f1.4 85mm (double panorama shot together.)

     

    ***WARNING LOTS OF WIND NOISE***



    [ad_2]

    Source link

    Vil Muhametshin – 360Cities Blog

    [ad_1]

    Vil has been creating multimedia virtual tours and 360° panoramas since 2003. He is a professional of  high definition (HDR) spherical 360-degree panoramic images; loves to create  ground, elevated and aerial panoramas; eager to find creative solutions for specific cases such as theatrical and art projects, historic reenactments or museums; builds interactive virtual tours based on aerial and ground panoramas and enhanced tours with bird’s-eye view photography and video.

    So far Vil  was mainly working in Europe – he lives in Riga, Latvia – and has traveled around Europe – France, Italy, Sweden, Spain… but he is always looking for new horizons and co-operation possibilities.

    Discover some of his 360º masterpieces below and more on Vil’s profile page.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

    Story Behind The Image “Supervised Play” – Barger Nature Photography

    [ad_1]

    A sequence of images of young polar bear cubs playing on the tundra in Wapusk National Park, Manitoba, Canada while their mother watches intently.

    These images of a mother polar bear with her two cubs playfully sparring while she watched intently, were captured this past winter in Wapusk National Park, Manitoba, Canada. I spent the first two weeks of March this year in the Canadian tundra with a small group of photographers. Our primary goal: photograph these awesome mammals in their natural environment. The cubs in these images are only a few months old, so they are extremely small in size.

    Local guides are required to enter the Park. Travel is done using vehicles modified to negotiate the rough tundra terrain. Travel in these vehicles is very slow and bumpy, Typical speeds for these vehicles would max out at 10 miles per hour.

    Early in the morning on my first full day in the Park, two of our guides spotted a polar bear family sleeping on the tundra. After a long, slow, and bumpy ride, which took over an hour, we arrived at the site early in the afternoon to find all three bears curled in a big ball, sleeping, and covered with snow. The sound of the tundra vehicles as they approach does not alarm them, since the mother is familiar with the sound and the cubs follow their mother’s actions.

    Proceeding in a slow and methodical manner, I set up my camera, lens, and tripod maintaining the Park Services recommended viewing distance. For the next couple of hours, I patiently waited in the cold temperatures and blowing snow as the bears slept. Periodically, there would be a hint of activity when the mother would open her eyes and raise her head to make sure all was OK. She would then lower her head, close her eyes and continue resting, always aware of her surroundings. Several times, the cubs would wake up and move a bit, always maintaining physical contact with their mother.

    Around three o’clock in the afternoon, all three finally woke-up and began to move. The cubs then proceeded to climb all over their mother pulling her fur, ears, and paws, while maintaining physical contact with her. After 30 to 40 minutes of this, the cubs then began playful sparring. At first, they would stay close to her, but after a short time began to move away but no farther than 15 to 20 feet off to her side. This is when these images were taken.

    It is always a challenge how to depict motion in a single wall print. After thinking about it for awhile, I decided to make a montage using the images from the sequence. The image featured in the center would be the mother intently watching her cubs sparring close by. This image would then set the stage for the remaining images of the cubs sparring which would be placed around the center image. The spacing between the cubs and their mother was outside the field of view of my lens so I could not include the mother in these images.

    [rl_gallery id=”513″]

    After further thought, I decided to use the images of the cubs sparring, to make a sequence. Since the action occurred quickly, I was able to pick 10 images where the background remained constant, using these images for the time lapse sequence.

    [responsive_vimeo https://vimeo.com/412780199]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

    Add your own keyboard shortcuts in PixInsight

    [ad_1]

    PixInsight has many keyboard short cuts build in right from the start (you can find an overview of them here.), some very useful while others won’t get used at all probably. One thing that bothered me though is that I can’t start processes using keyboard short cuts so I decided to look for a way around this. Luckily there is this great open source program called AutoHotkey that will let you define your own keyboard shortcuts and basically have them do anything you like. Even better; you can also program mouse buttons and movements!

    Using AutoHotkey

    You can download AutoHotkey for free here. As far as I’m aware, this only works on Windows at the moment. AutoHotkey will work with so called scripts, in which you can program the keystrokes or mouse behaviour it needs to react on and define what the program will need to do once it detected the particular keystroke(s).
    This scripting can seem a bit complicated from the start, but there is a lot of great documentation and examples available. I’ll post some example code specificaly for PixInsight further down in this post.

    Now let’s run briefly through the required steps to use AutoHotkey to add custom keyboard shortcuts to PixInsight:

    1. Download and install AutoHotkey
    2. Download AutoHotkey here and simply run the installer

    3. Add AutoHotkey to Startup
    4. It will be really convenient for AutoHotkey to always run in the background, so add it to Startup

    5. Create a script
    6. Now it’s time to start creating a script for AutoHotkey;

      1. Right-Click on your desktop.
      2. Find “New” in the menu.
      3. Click “AutoHotkey Script” inside the “New” menu.
      4. Give the script a new name. Note: It must end with a .ahk extension. Ex. MyScript.ahk
      5. Find the newly created file on your desktop and Right-Click it.
      6. Click “Edit Script”.
      7. A window should have popped up, probably Notepad.

      Now we can start editing the file to create some shortcuts for PixInsight.

    7. Special keys and their symbols
    8. First we need to be aware of the symbols we’ll need to use to define certain keys like Alt, Ctrl and Shift. AutoHotkey uses the following symbols for the keys:

      Symbol Key
      # Win (Windows key)
      ! Alt
      ^ Ctrl
      + Shift
      Use the left key of the pair. e.g.
      > Use the right key of the pair. i.e. >+a = right Shift + a

    9. Add a custom shortcut for an existing keyboard shortcut in PixInsight
    10. Let’s start really easy and simply use another keyboard shortcut to toggle the ScreenTransferFunction. The default shortcut for this is F12, which I don’t find convenient for frequent use. Let’s say we want to use Alt+S instead. We can do this with this simple line of code:
      !s::send, {F12}

    11. Save the script and run it
    12. Save the file and double click it on your desktop to run it. Now open up PixInsight and open an image on which you can test the ScreenTransferFunction Toggle. Hit Alt+S to toggle the ScreenTransferFunction!

    Now you have your first script succesfully working, let’s dive in a bit deeper and use the PixInsight Console to open up Processes

    Open up Processes with keyboard shortcuts

    Most people probably won’t know this, but the PixInsight console is more than just a monitor for processes to output to and which you can keep an eye on to see what’s going on when you execute processes. It is also a really extensive input console which you can use to do really a lot of (complicated) stuff. This is very useful in this case because it is the console we will use to fire up Processes instead of mimicking mouse movements and menu clicks which are far less reliable. Luckily there is even a keyboard short cut to open up the Console in PixInsight, so scripting a custom keyboard shortcut in AutoHotkey for PixInsight is remarkably easy!
    Basically we need to do 6 things when we want to open up a process;

    1. Define the keyboard shortcut that needs to trigger the opening of the process.
    2. Let’s open up the ScreenTransferFunction with Ctrl+Alt+Shift+S. We can do this by starting the script with ^!+s::
      Note: Please be aware of existing keyboard short cuts like Ctrl+S to save a file, and avoid using those.

    3. Open the Console
    4. We can open the console with ^!c

    5. Wait for the Console window to open
    6. We can’t start typing right away, we’ll need to wait till the window is opened. This can be done by using the sleep command and specifying the time in miliseconds that AutoHotkey needs to wait. sleep, 600 is what I use to make sure PixInsight has opened up the Console window.

    7. Type in the name of the process we want to open
    8. We can simply send keystrokes to mimick typing. To open up the interface window of a process from the console, all we have to do is add ‘–interface’ to the name of the process.

    9. Hit Enter
    10. To mimic hitting enter we can simply add; {enter}

    11. Tell AutoHotkey we are done with the actions for this particular shortcut
    12. If we use only one line of code like before, we don’t need to specify the end of the script and we can simply begin a new shortcut on a new line in the file. If we use multiple actions like we are doing now, we need to tell AutoHotkey when this collection of actions end so that we can start up a new shortcut after it.
      We do this by simply adding “Return”

    If we combine this we’ll get the following code:

    ^!+s::
    send, ^!c
    sleep, 600
    send, ScreenTransferFunction --interface {enter}
    Return

    Now save the file and right-click the AutoHotkey icon in the Taskbar and Reload the script.

    Go to PixInsight and try it out!

    Add more keyboard shortcuts in the same script file

    You can just continu adding more shortcuts by placing the code for new keyboard shortcuts after the previous ones. We’ve seen two examples already, now let’s just add a third one to open another Process interface; Windows key + S for Starmask.

    #s::
    send, ^!c
    sleep, 600
    send, StarMask --interface {enter}
    Return

    It is usefull to add comments in the script file, so you can keep track of what everything means. You can do this by starting a line with “;”.
    If we combine all three examples and add comments, our script file will look like this:


    ;ScreenTransferFunction - Toggle
    !s::send, {F12}

    ;ScreenTransferFunction – Interface
    ^!+s::
    send, ^!c
    sleep, 600
    send, ScreenTransferFunction –interface {enter}
    Return

    ;Open StarMask interface
    #s::
    send, ^!c
    sleep, 600
    send, StarMask –interface {enter}
    Return

    Limit the keyboard shortcuts to only work in PixInsight

    It is very useful to limit the keyboard shortcuts to only work in PixInsight. This enables you to use the same keyboard shortcuts again in other programs for instance.
    You can do this by simply using the #ifWinActive statement with the title of the window. So in our case we’ll be adding the following to your script: #ifWinActive PixInsight 1.8 and place the keyboard shortcuts for PI between {}
    So if we add this, now our script file looks like this:


    #ifWinActive PixInsight 1.8
    {
    ;ScreenTransferFunction - Toggle
    !s::send, {F12}

    ;ScreenTransferFunction – Interface
    ^!+s::
    send, ^!c
    sleep, 600
    send, ScreenTransferFunction –interface {enter}
    Return

    ;Open StarMask interface
    #s::
    send, ^!c
    sleep, 600
    send, StarMask –interface {enter}
    Return
    }

    Add more commands

    In addition to opening up the process windows, you can also execute them with certain settings and do a lot more using the Console in PixInsight.
    Just type in –help in addition to the process name to see all the things you can do in the Console with that particular process.
    Please let us know in the comments below if you have any good ideas for more keyboard shortcuts!


    [ad_2]

    Source link

    5 Must-Know Facebook Tips For Photographers

    [ad_1]

    Having a successful Facebook page is the highest level of digital branding.

    Why? It’s because this social media platform has the largest market share with 2.93-billion active monthly users. So, success on Facebook means great exposure and sales.

    No wonder why every professional is in a constant struggle to improve their page’s performance. You’ll find them posting daily, developing strategies, and whatnot. Some even use growth services that help get Facebook free likes and followers.

    However, growing a Facebook page isn’t that hard. Today, we’ll share some amazing must-know Facebook tips for photographers to help boost your page instantly. Let’s dive in!

    Facebook Tips For Photographers

    Post Consistently

    Both algorithms and people prefer Facebook pages that are active.

    When you post consistently, the viewers stay updated with the latest things going on in your photography business. This helps them feel involved and connected.

    Plus, a study suggests that when one thing pops up again and again in front of someone, it encourages them to make a purchase. So, consistent posts are an excellent way to boost sales too.

    As for algorithms, the activeness of a page triggers the bots to increase visibility. It shows the post on others’ feeds and even sends suggestion notifications.

    Optimize Your Page

    Never underestimate the power of optimizing your Facebook page. It helps increase the ranks of your page in the search results. So, when someone searches for photographers or photography, your page will pop up.

    Here are some Facebook SEO tips to follow:

    • Fill in the About Us accurately
    • Use keywords in the content
    • Claim the vanity URL
    • Get backlinks

    The keyword point is the most important. These key terms should be sprinkled naturally in your page title, about us, contact, and even the captions.

    Facebook Tips For Photographers

    Use Videos & Livestreams

    Perhaps, we don’t need to emphasize the need for high-quality images for your page. As a photographer, you would know that people are attracted to flawless images. But, while trying to build a portfolio, don’t forget videos and live streams.

    Research says that videos are 1200% more effective in delivering the message. They generate more likes and shares than any other content form. So, make sure you upload at least 1 to 2 videos every week.

    These videos can be anything from a recap of the last year’s work or behind-the-scenes of a current project. You can even skip the trouble of video making and editing by going live.

    Be Human

    Engagement with the audience is crucial to create a loyal community. You need to interact, socialize, and let them know that there’s a real person behind the screen.

    Post about your struggles and achievements. Make people feel comfortable and connect with them on similar grounds. They would feel more confident in doing business when they know you and them are alike.

    Also, do not overstress about publishing overpolished content. Too much perfection often gives a fake and cold feel to your business.

    Facebook Tips For Photographers

    Run Facebook Ads

    Facebook ads are a great marketing tool that lets the platform handle the duty to increase exposure. Of course, it’s not free, but it’s worth the money.

    All you have to do is select the post and sponsor it. Facebook will drive the results for you!


    Related Articles:

    [ad_2]

    Source link